BEIRUT (Reuters) – The US-Iran agreement — the first signed by an American and an Iranian president since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution — is being hailed by its backers as the deal of the century._x000D_
_x000D_
But for Tehran’s adversaries across the Middle East — from Israel to Gulf states and factions in Lebanon — it looks more like the curse of the century: an accord that could leave Iran more secure, more legitimate and ultimately more influential._x000D_
_x000D_
US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed the interim deal on Wednesday, ending a three-month war._x000D_
_x000D_
Trump chose to formalise it at Versailles, on the sidelines of the G7 summit — a setting widely seen as symbolic of the remaking of international order after conflict._x000D_
_x000D_
The 14-point agreement extends a ceasefire by 60 days, including in Lebanon, to allow negotiations on a permanent settlement and address issues such as Iran’s nuclear programme._x000D_
_x000D_
“For Washington and Tehran, this is a grand bargain — the deal of the century, with no turning back,” said Lebanese commentator Sarkis Naoum._x000D_
_x000D_
“The probability of success outweighs the risk of failure. Iran cannot endure further economic pain under sanctions, and Trump has no incentive to start a new war.”_x000D_
_x000D_
DEAL IS A SETBACK FOR ISRAEL_x000D_
_x000D_
Israeli analyst Danny Citrinowicz described the agreement as a strategic “catastrophe”._x000D_
_x000D_
What had been framed as a joint US-Israeli campaign to weaken, or even topple â the Islamic Republic has, in his view, flipped into American recognition of Iran._x000D_
_x000D_
“We went to topple the regime with US backing and ended with Washington effectively giving legitimacy and strengthening the same regime we wanted to bring down,” said Citrinowicz, a senior Iran researcher at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies._x000D_
_x000D_
He says the deal delivers none of Israel’s core demands: no curbs on Iran’s missile programme or proxies and no clear path to dismantling its nuclear facilities._x000D_
_x000D_
Even Israel’s campaign in Lebanon has been constrained by the ceasefire framework imposed at Iran’s insistence._x000D_
_x000D_
The fallout is both political and strategic. The deal undercuts Netanyahu’s narrative on Iran and exposes the limits of his leverage with a US president seen as closely aligned with Israel._x000D_
_x000D_
Citrinowicz says Iran has gained room to manoeuvre and the deal risks entrenching its position while deepening Israel’s isolation._x000D_
_x000D_
“Everything is bad,” he said bluntly. “And it’s only going to get worse.”_x000D_
_x000D_
If the agreement holds, Iran appears to secure the stronger outcome: an end to the war, phased sanctions relief, renewed oil exports and the prospect of vast reconstruction funds — alongside implicit acceptance of its political system._x000D_
_x000D_
Washington, by contrast, falls short of goals it shared with Israel: toppling the clerical establishment, dismantling Iran’s nuclear programme and curbing its regional reach. Rather than reshaping Iran’s position, the deal restores it._x000D_
_x000D_
The US and Israel launched the war on Iran on February 28, assassinating the 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior figures in the â first days._x000D_
_x000D_
The conflict spiralled, killing more than 7,000 people, mostly in Iran and Lebanon, while driving up energy prices and raising fears of a food crisis in developing states._x000D_
_x000D_
IRAN GAINS UPPER HAND IN LEBANON_x000D_
_x000D_
For Lebanon, the agreement tilts the balance toward Iran, reinforcing the role of Tehran-backed Hezbollah and folding the country into a broader US-Iran framework while sidelining Beirut-Israel talks._x000D_
_x000D_
It binds Lebanon into the 60-day ceasefire, committing all sides to halt operations across all fronts._x000D_
_x000D_
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun warned last week that Iran cannot negotiate on Lebanon’s behalf on issues such as the ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal from southern territory._x000D_
_x000D_
But sources close to Hezbollah argue the opposite: that the US-Iran track strengthens Lebanon’s position by elevating it into a higher-level negotiation._x000D_
_x000D_
In their view, Tehran and Washington can pressure their respective allies — â Hezbollah and Israel — to deliver a settlement._x000D_
_x000D_
Alarm is sharpest in the Gulf, where Iranian attacks have shaken confidence in long-standing security arrangements._x000D_
_x000D_
Gulf states have emerged as the war’s main losers — spectators to decisions that reshaped their security landscape and now left to absorb the fallout._x000D_
_x000D_
Gulf sources say the deal is already reshaping strategic thinking: eroding confidence in US protection, entrenching Iran as an enduring regional force and accelerating a shift toward accommodation rather than confrontation._x000D_
_x000D_
Iran expert Alex Vatanka, however, pushes back against that anxiety. Rather than capitulation, he sees â the agreement as the least bad outcome after years of failed coercion._x000D_
_x000D_
“They tried to take Iran down militarily. They couldn’t. The alternative would have been catastrophic — a wider war could have devastated the Gulf for decades,” said Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington._x000D_
_x000D_
The real test lies ahead — in implementation of the deal, in the unresolved nuclear negotiations, and in the regional reactions it will provoke, he said: “It’s big, but it’s not the end of it. It’s â just the beginning.”_x000D_
_x000D_
ISRAEL CAN BE A SPOILER_x000D_
_x000D_
Some analysts see Israel as the main wild card. While unlikely to derail a process owned by Trump, they warn the risk remains — particularly in Lebanon._x000D_
_x000D_
“Israel has been isolated, after this war, both in the region and in the world,” said one Iranian official, who declined to be named._x000D_
_x000D_
“Iran got what it wanted…We did not abandon our friends, such as Hezbollah, rather, we were even prepared to go to the extent of walking away from the table and returning to war because of them,” added another.
